๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—›๐—ฅ๐—  ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€

CFP
Journal
online
SUBMISSION DEADLINE
30/11/2026
JOURNAL
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
PUBLISHER
Taylor & Francis
GUEST EDITORS
Benjamin Laker, Sven Horak, Toyin Ajibade Adisa, Fulya Acikgoz
POSTED ON
16/06/2026

DETAILS

๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—›๐—ฅ๐—  ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€

๐—๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น:
The International Journal of Human Resource Management

๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ:
Taylor & Francis Group

๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ:
30 November 2026

๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ

Inclusion has become a defining aspiration of contemporary Human Resource Management (HRM), embedded across recruitment, leadership development, employee engagement initiatives, and organizational values. However, the institutional foundations supporting inclusion are increasingly fragile. Political retrenchment, economic uncertainty, organizational ambivalence, and cultural contestation are collectively challenging the norms and mechanisms that once sustained inclusive workplaces.

This Special Issue explores the concept of institutional fragility of inclusionโ€”a condition where inclusion is publicly endorsed but inconsistently implemented, weakly governed, or symbolically maintained without substantive commitment. It seeks to understand how identity differences continue to shape workplaces when formal inclusion structures weaken or become contested.

The issue encourages contributions that move beyond static and categorical understandings of identity and instead conceptualize inclusion as a dynamic process influenced by power relations, legitimacy, resistance, and institutional uncertainty. It also examines how HRM systems may simultaneously promote, regulate, suppress, or contest workplace inclusion.

๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜

Submissions may address, but are not limited to:

โ€ข Organisational responses to the erosion or contestation of inclusion mandates
โ€ข Identity construction, negotiation, and resistance within HRM systems
โ€ข Symbolic inclusion versus substantive organisational change
โ€ข Performance management, leadership pipelines, and โ€œculture fitโ€ as mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion
โ€ข Comparative and global analyses of inclusion across institutional, legal, and cultural contexts
โ€ข HRM as a mechanism of voice suppression, identity masking, or strategic silence
โ€ข Intersectional identities and their influence on opportunity, legitimacy, and recognition in organisations
โ€ข Informal networks and shadow structures that sustain or undermine inclusion efforts
โ€ข Experiences of inclusion and exclusion following organisational retreat from formal DEI commitments
โ€ข Institutional logics, power asymmetries, and the politics of belonging in HRM systems
โ€ข Decolonial and Indigenous critiques of Western-centric inclusion frameworks in global HRM
โ€ข Identity as both an object of organisational regulation and a site of resistance
โ€ข Inclusion practices and identity experiences in non-Western and underrepresented contexts

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€

As organizations increasingly face political polarization, economic pressures, and shifting societal expectations, the sustainability of workplace inclusion has become uncertain. Formal commitments to diversity and inclusion may coexist with weakened implementation, contested legitimacy, and growing institutional ambiguity.

This Special Issue provides an important platform for critically examining how inclusion is interpreted, enacted, challenged, and transformed within contemporary HRM systems. It seeks to generate new theoretical insights and practical understanding of identity, power, and institutional change in workplaces across diverse global contexts.

๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—˜๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€

Professor Benjamin Laker
Henley Business School, University of Reading, United Kingdom
Email: Benjamin.laker@henley.ac.uk

Professor Sven Horak
St. John's University, New York, USA
Email: horaks@stjohns.edu

Professor Toyin Ajibade Adisa
Royal Docks School of Business and Law, University of East London, United Kingdom
Email: t.adisa@uel.ac.uk

Dr. Fulya Acikgoz
University of Sussex Business School, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
Email: F.Acikgoz@sussex.ac.uk

๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—˜๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€

Benjamin Laker is a Professor at Henley Business School whose research focuses on leadership, organizational behaviour, workplace inclusion, and future-of-work strategies.

Sven Horak is a Professor at St. Johnโ€™s University specializing in comparative management, cross-cultural leadership, diversity, and international human resource management.

Toyin Ajibade Adisa is a Professor at the University of East London whose research interests include diversity and inclusion, work-life balance, equality in organizations, and contemporary HRM practices.

Fulya Acikgoz is a scholar at the University of Sussex Business School whose research focuses on organizational behaviour, workplace diversity, talent management, and employee inclusion.

๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€

โ€ข Manuscripts should generally not exceed 10,000 words, including references, tables, and figures.
โ€ข Empirical, theoretical, conceptual, and methodological contributions are welcome.
โ€ข Critical literature reviews, historically informed analyses, and comparative or multi-level studies are encouraged.
โ€ข Contributions grounded in intersectionality, social identity theory, critical race theory, feminist perspectives, and postcolonial approaches are particularly welcomed.
โ€ข All manuscripts should follow The International Journal of Human Resource Management submission guidelines and will undergo a rigorous peer-review process.

๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น

The International Journal of Human Resource Management is a leading international journal publishing high-quality research on strategic human resource management, employment relations, organizational behaviour, leadership, diversity, and global people management. The journal promotes theoretically rigorous and practically relevant scholarship that advances understanding of contemporary workforce challenges across diverse international contexts.

๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚ ๐—”๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ โ€” ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—”๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ & ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

Visit official website of the publisher

COMMENTS (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

SIGN IN TO COMMENT

Related Posts