Balancing Equity and Equality in Street-Level Bureaucracy: Comparative Perspectives
DETAILS
Call for papers
Special Issue: Balancing Equity and Equality in Street-Level Bureaucracy: Comparative Perspectives
Journal: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
Manuscript Deadline: 30 September 2026
About the Special Issue
The Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice invites submissions for its Special Issue titled "Balancing Equity and Equality in Street-Level Bureaucracy: Comparative Perspectives."
This Special Issue seeks to advance understanding of how street-level bureaucrats—including social workers, educators, police officers, healthcare professionals, and other frontline public servants—navigate the complex balance between equity and equality in public service delivery across different institutional, national, and policy contexts.
Street-level bureaucrats play a critical role in translating public policy into everyday practice. While they are expected to promote social equity by addressing the diverse needs of marginalized populations, they must also ensure procedural fairness and equal treatment for all citizens. This tension creates significant ethical, political, and practical challenges that vary across governance systems and service sectors.
The Special Issue welcomes comparative theoretical and empirical research that explores how these competing principles are interpreted and implemented in different organizational, cultural, and policy environments. Contributions from scholars across disciplines, regions, and career stages are strongly encouraged.
Scope and Topics of Interest
Submissions may address, but are not limited to:
Comparative analyses of equity versus equality in public service delivery
Fairness, efficiency, and public service values
Street-level bureaucracy across education, healthcare, policing, and social welfare
Comparative perspectives on public, private, and third-sector service delivery
Organizational and cultural differences in frontline decision-making
Street-level discretion and social equity
Perceptions of deservingness in public service provision
National and subnational policy comparisons
Policy design and implementation through comparative perspectives
Frontline management and institutional governance
Ethical challenges in public administration
Cross-national and cross-sectoral comparative policy analysis
Submission Guidelines
Authors should submit an abstract of 250–300 words clearly outlining the paper title, research focus, methodology, data sources, and comparative perspective.
Proposals should align with the Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis aims and comparative research criteria.
Accepted authors will be invited to submit full manuscripts for peer review.
All full papers must follow the journal's author guidelines and be submitted through the official submission system.
Guest Editors
Nissim Cohen
University of Haifa, Israel
Gabriela Lotta
FGV EAESP, Brazil
Ofek Edri-Peer
University of Haifa, Israel
Posted on ServiceSetu Academics — Premier Platform for Academic Opportunities & Research Collaboration
COMMENTS (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
SIGN IN TO COMMENT