"Trends in European Forest Policy Research"
DETAILS
Call for Papers-"Trends in European Forest Policy Research"
Journal: Forest Policy and Economics
Publisher: Elsevier
Submission Deadline: 31 Mar 2027
Submission Portal | Article Type | Author Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
"VSI: trends in European forest policy research" |
Key Requirements:
Perception–reality gap analytical focus
IFPM6 contributions + global/comparative perspectives
Theory-informed + robust methodology mandatory
Overview
Forest policy = science + politics + societal expectations mismatch. Explores perception-reality gaps affecting governance effectiveness across empirical evidence vs. cultural/historical contexts. Special focus on post-socialist Central/Eastern Europe + global comparisons.
Key Research Themes
Post-Socialist Transformations:
Governance dynamics in transitioning contexts
Institutional legacies vs. modern policy demands
Perception Formation:
Policy narratives/discourse/framing analysis
Stakeholder social acceptance/conflict mapping
Knowledge Integration:
Scientific evidence → policy/practice translation
Expert assessments vs. public understanding
Institutional Analysis:
Credibility/trust/legitimacy evaluations
Economic inefficiencies from perception gaps
Comparative Studies:
Regional governance/policy instrument contrasts
Submission Details
Opens: 01 June 2026
Closes: 31 March 2027
MANDATORY: Select "VSI: trends in European forest policy research"
IFPM6 selected papers featured
Guest Editor Team
Technical University in Zvolen, Slovakia:
Dr. Zuzana Dobšinská (dobsinska@is.tuzvo.sk)
Dr. Jaroslav Salka (salka@is.tuzvo.sk)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic:
Dr. Petra Palátová (palatovap@fld.czu.cz)
Dr. Vilém Jarský (jarsky@fld.czu.cz)
Dr. Radek Rinn (rinn@fld.czu.cz)
Why This Issue Matters
First systematic perception-reality gap analysis in forest policy. Addresses policy implementation failures through analytical rigor. Essential for improving legitimacy/outcomes amid competing interests + ecosystem service tensions.
Methodological Priorities
Beyond descriptive: Theory-driven analyses
Transparent methods: Qualitative/quantitative/mixed
Global transferability: International relevance
Actionable implications: Policy/practice recommendations
IFPM6 Context: 6th International Forest Policy Meeting selected contributions
ServiceSetu Academics — Premier Platform for Academic Opportunities & Research Collaboration
COMMENTS (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
SIGN IN TO COMMENT